Marketing Foundation
Compact two-skill starter: clarify positioning and choose a lead magnet. Use Marketing Launch for the broader eight-skill go-to-market workflow.
The tunnel uses the same cards as the catalogue. Browse only as deep as needed — or load a broad bundle immediately.
SEO, Sales, Agents or another broad area → one bundle call → work.
Read-only access to published skills. Default 8, maximum 10 skills / 120,000 characters.
Compact two-skill starter: clarify positioning and choose a lead magnet. Use Marketing Launch for the broader eight-skill go-to-market workflow.
Build an evidence-led marketing plan from ICP and competition through positioning, campaigns, growth and measurement.
Diagnose architecture and context, plan agent-team responsibilities, then organize project context and session handoffs. Memory and cost-runtime reviews remain outside this pack.
Review the journey from landing page and lead capture through registration, first value and transparent upgrades.
Plan a campaign, draft its channel content and review the work against actual brand guidance.
Prioritize an editorial roadmap and plan how to launch and distribute it across suitable channels.
Understand customer needs, compare competitors and plan a community around real member value.
Choose a relevant lead magnet, then draft a permission-based nurture journey with entry, suppression and exit rules.
Define the API contract, then plan how to observe its latency, failures and retries. Guidance and checklist; no production changes.
Profile a dataset, choose and interpret statistical methods, then validate calculations and conclusions before sharing.
Define the target account, prioritize buying signals, plan a human LinkedIn engagement routine and prepare evidence-led responses to buyer concerns.
Review demand, alternatives and risk signals before building a product.
--- name: before-you-build description: "Review product risk before coding by checking demand, alternatives, channels, switching costs, and failure signals." category: product risk: safe source: community source_repo: bin1874/before-you-build-skill source_type: community date_added: "2026-07-02" author: bin1874 tags: [product-validation, planning, ai-coding, risk-review] tools: [claude, cursor, codex, gemini, antigravity] license: "MIT" license_source: "https://github.com/bin1874/before-you-build-skill/blob/main/LICENSE" --- # Before You Build ## Overview Before You Build helps an AI coding workflow pause before implementation and check whether the feature, product, or tool is worth building. It focuses on product risk rather than code structure: who needs the thing, what they use today, why they would switch, how distribution works, and what evidence would make the project safer to start. The upstream project ships a standalone skill repository and an `npx` installer for several coding assistants. ## When to Use This Skill - Use when a user asks an AI coding assistant to build a new app, feature, internal tool, SaaS, or side project. - Use when the idea sounds plausible but the buyer, workflow, distribution path, or switching reason is still vague. - Use before writing code so the assistant can turn the request into sharper assumptions, risk checks, and validation steps. ## How It Works ### Step 1: Identify the Build Bet Restate the product or feature in one concrete sentence. Name the intended user, the job they are trying to finish, and the current workaround or competitor. ### Step 2: Check the Main Risks Review the idea across demand, workflow fit, willingness to switch, distribution, pricing, data access, and operational burden. Prefer specific doubts over generic brainstorming. ### Step 3: Decide the Next Small Test Suggest the smallest useful validation step before implementation. This could be a buyer conversation, landing page test, manual concierge workflow, prototype, waitlist, paid pilot, or narrow internal trial. ### Step 4: Continue or Stop If the risk is acceptable, move into implementation with the assumptions written down. If the risk is high or evidence is weak, recommend a smaller experiment instead of building the full version. ## Examples ### Example 1: SaaS Feature Request ```text User: Build a dashboard for AI trend monitoring. Before coding, check: - Which role needs this dashboard every week? - What source do they use today? - What decision changes because of the dashboard? - Would they pay for alerts, reports, or workflow integration? - What is the smallest manual report that proves repeat use? ``` ### Example 2: Internal Tool ```text User: Build an internal CRM for our small team. Before coding, check: - What breaks in the current spreadsheet or existing CRM? - How many people will use it daily? - What data must be imported or kept in sync? - What process change is required after launch? - Can a no-code workflow prove the need first? ``` ## Best Practices - ✅ Ask for the user, job, current alternative, and switching reason before implementation. - ✅ Separate product risk from engineering risk so the team does not solve the wrong problem well. - ✅ Recommend small validation steps when the idea has weak demand evidence. - ✅ Keep product names, numbers, and claims grounded in what the user provides. - ❌ Do not present a generic checklist as proof that an idea is validated. - ❌ Do not fabricate market size, revenue, competitor traction, or buyer quotes. ## Limitations - This skill does not replace customer research, legal review, financial advice, or domain expert review. - It cannot prove demand by itself; it helps the assistant surface assumptions and choose a smaller validation step. - If the user already has strong evidence and a clear spec, keep the review short and move into implementation. ## Security & Safety Notes - This skill is safe to run as a planning layer because it does not require credentials, external network access, or file mutation. - If paired with an installer or repository fetch, only install from the upstream repository or npm package you trust. ## Common Pitfalls - **Problem:** The assistant repeats the product pitch instead of challenging the assumptions. **Solution:** Ask for current alternatives, switching triggers, and a validation step before code. - **Problem:** The review becomes too broad and blocks progress. **Solution:** Pick the riskiest assumption and test only that first. - **Problem:** The idea is treated as a startup even when it is a small internal workflow. **Solution:** Scale the risk review to the project size and only ask questions that change the build decision. ## Related Skills - `@saas-mvp-launcher` - Use when moving from validation into MVP planning and launch execution. - `@ux-research-methodology` - Use when the next step needs structured user research.
Review demand, alternatives and risk signals before building a product.
The complete original guidance with attribution and declared limits.
Clarify the evidence and task scope, then use the source guidance within actual authorization.
Product hypothesis, target users, alternatives evidence and decision owner.
Original frontmatter declares MIT; its notice and named author are preserved. Referenced runtimes, scripts, integrations and sibling skills are not bundled or installed. Brief obvious-danger screening only; no functional test or comprehensive safety certification. Loading this text authorizes no external action.
Use Before You Build / Product Risk for [TASK]. Clarify Product hypothesis, target users, alternatives evidence and decision owner. Identify evidence gaps and missing dependencies. Do not claim results, approval or execution without evidence.
Treating this attributed guidance as installed software, professional certification or authorization for external actions.
German routing and delivery limits. Original attribution: bin1874. Original frontmatter declares MIT; its notice and named author are preserved. Referenced runtimes, scripts, integrations and sibling skills are not bundled or installed. Brief obvious-danger screening only; no functional test or comprehensive safety certification. Loading this text authorizes no external action.
MIT License Copyright (c) 2026 Pawel Huryn Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
Copy the text below, then paste it into your chat.