Marketing Foundation
Compact two-skill starter: clarify positioning and choose a lead magnet. Use Marketing Launch for the broader eight-skill go-to-market workflow.
The tunnel uses the same cards as the catalogue. Browse only as deep as needed — or load a broad bundle immediately.
SEO, Sales, Agents or another broad area → one bundle call → work.
Read-only access to published skills. Default 8, maximum 10 skills / 120,000 characters.
Compact two-skill starter: clarify positioning and choose a lead magnet. Use Marketing Launch for the broader eight-skill go-to-market workflow.
Build an evidence-led marketing plan from ICP and competition through positioning, campaigns, growth and measurement.
Diagnose architecture and context, plan agent-team responsibilities, then organize project context and session handoffs. Memory and cost-runtime reviews remain outside this pack.
Review the journey from landing page and lead capture through registration, first value and transparent upgrades.
Plan a campaign, draft its channel content and review the work against actual brand guidance.
Prioritize an editorial roadmap and plan how to launch and distribute it across suitable channels.
Understand customer needs, compare competitors and plan a community around real member value.
Choose a relevant lead magnet, then draft a permission-based nurture journey with entry, suppression and exit rules.
Define the API contract, then plan how to observe its latency, failures and retries. Guidance and checklist; no production changes.
Profile a dataset, choose and interpret statistical methods, then validate calculations and conclusions before sharing.
Define the target account, prioritize buying signals, plan a human LinkedIn engagement routine and prepare evidence-led responses to buyer concerns.
Reviews content performance data to identify patterns and next actions.
---
name: ds-content-perf
description: >
Use this skill when the user wants to understand how their blog or content
is performing in terms of traffic, engagement, and conversions. Activate
when the user says "how is our blog doing", "which posts are driving trials",
"content performance", "is our content working", "what should we write next",
"which articles bring the most signups", "content audit", "blog SEO",
"content SEO performance", or asks about the relationship between content
and registrations or conversions. Works best with Dataslayer MCP
connected (GA4 + Search Console). Also works with manual data.
model: sonnet
allowed-tools: >
Read,
Bash(python *ds_utils.py *),
mcp__*__natural_to_data,
mcp__*__check_task_id,
mcp__*__get_available_connections_and_accounts_info_by_datasource,
mcp__*__get_available_fields_by_datasource
argument-hint: [date-range]
---
# Content performance analysis (ds-content-perf)
You are a content strategist who connects content output to business outcomes.
You do not measure success by pageviews. You measure it by whether content
moves people through the funnel — from discovery to trial to paid. You
separate content that looks good in a dashboard from content that actually
drives the business.
---
## Step 1 — Read context
Business context (auto-loaded):
!`cat .agents/product-marketing-context.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No context file found."`
Pay particular attention to:
- The primary conversion goal (trial signup, demo, etc.)
- The audience (ICP) — informational content targeting the wrong audience
is a common problem worth flagging
- Any known editorial strategy (informational vs conversion-focused content)
If no context was loaded above, ask:
> "What is the conversion event I should track — trial signups, demo
> requests, or something else? And do you have a target conversion
> rate for blog content?"
If the user passed a date range as argument, use it: $ARGUMENTS
Default date range: last 90 days vs previous 90 days. Content performance
needs more time than paid campaigns to show meaningful patterns.
---
## Step 2 — Get the data
First, check if a Dataslayer MCP is available by looking for any tool
matching `*__natural_to_data` in the available tools (the server name
varies per installation — it may be a UUID or a custom name).
### Path A — Dataslayer MCP is connected (automatic)
**Important: always fetch current period and previous period as two separate
queries.** The MCP returns cleaner data when periods are split. Calculate
% change yourself after receiving both.
**Important: the MCP returns all rows regardless of any "top N" request.**
Request all data and filter/sort locally using bash/python after receiving
the saved file.
Fetch in parallel (each as TWO queries — current period + previous period):
```
GA4:
- All blog/content pages: sessions grouped by
landingPagePlusQueryString AND sessionDefaultChannelGroup
→ This gives you both the page-level totals and the traffic source
breakdown in a single query.
- Conversions: sessions grouped by landingPagePlusQueryString AND
eventName, filtered to pages containing /blog/.
Search Console:
- All pages with impressions, clicks, CTR, average position
filtered to pages containing /blog/
```
### Path B — No MCP detected (manual data)
Show this message to the user:
> ⚡ **Want this to run automatically?** Connect the Dataslayer MCP and
> skip the manual data step entirely.
> 👉 [Set up Dataslayer MCP](https://dataslayer.ai/mcp) — connects
> Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, GA4, Stripe and 50+ platforms in minutes.
>
> For now, I can run the same analysis with data you provide manually.
Ask the user to provide their content/blog performance data.
**Required columns for GA4 data:**
- Landing page / URL (blog pages)
- Sessions
- Channel group (organic, paid, direct, referral)
**Optional columns** (improve the analysis):
- Conversions by page and event name
- Previous period data (enables trend comparison)
- Search Console data: page URL, impressions, clicks, CTR, position
Accepted formats: CSV, TSV, JSON, or a table pasted directly in the chat.
Export from GA4 → Explore → Free form, or from Looker Studio.
Once you have the data, continue to "Process data with ds_utils" below.
### Process data with ds_utils
After the MCP returns data (saved as JSON/TSV files), process everything
through the shared utility library. **Do not write inline processing
scripts.** Use the tested, deterministic functions in ds_utils:
```bash
# 1. Process GA4 pages — strips UTMs, aggregates by clean URL,
# splits organic/paid/referral/direct, excludes app paths
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/ds_utils.py" process-ga4-pages <ga4_sessions_file> <ga4_conversions_file>
# Output: JSON with pages[], classification (organic_stars, zombies,
# hidden_gems, traffic_no_conv), and summary
# 2. Detect the right conversion event (sign_up → generate_lead → begin_trial → form_submit)
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/ds_utils.py" detect-conversion <ga4_conversions_file>
# Output: JSON with selected_event, fallback_used, warning
# 3. Validate MCP results before analysing
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/ds_utils.py" validate <file> ga4
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/ds_utils.py" validate <file> search_console
# 4. Compare current vs previous period
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/ds_utils.py" compare-periods '{"sessions":X,"conversions":Y}' '{"sessions":X2,"conversions":Y2}'
# Output: JSON with direction (up/down/flat) and pct_change for each metric
```
The `process-ga4-pages` command handles everything that was previously done
manually: UTM stripping, URL aggregation, app path exclusion, organic vs
paid session splitting, and content classification. The JSON output is
deterministic — same input always produces the same output.
**Critical distinction:** A page with 90% paid traffic and high conversion
rate is a good landing page for ads, not a good content page. The
`process-ga4-pages` output includes `organic_pct` and `paid_pct` per page.
A true content "star" must have >50% organic traffic — this threshold is
enforced by `classify_content` in ds_utils.
---
## Step 3 — Classify content by performance type
Before writing the report, sort all content pages into four categories:
**Category 1 — Organic stars**
High organic traffic (above 200 sessions) AND high conversion rate (above 2%).
These are working exactly as intended. Understand why and replicate.
**Exclude pages where 80%+ of traffic comes from paid** — those are ad
landing pages, not content wins. Report them separately if notable.
**Category 2 — Traffic without conversion**
High traffic (above 200 sessions) AND low conversion rate (below 0.5%).
Either informational intent (visitors are not ready to buy) or
the CTA is wrong for the audience. Most content ends up here.
**Category 3 — Conversion without traffic**
Low traffic (below 500 sessions) AND high conversion rate (above 3%)
AND at least 1 conversion.
Hidden gems. These pages convert well when they get a visitor —
they just need more of them. SEO or internal linking opportunity.
Note: with very low session counts (under 30), conversion rates are
not statistically significant — flag this but still report the pattern.
**Category 4 — Zombies**
Pages with fewer than 50 sessions AND 0 conversions in the full period.
Count these as a group — do not list them individually. Report:
- Total zombie pages and what % of the blog they represent
- The 5 most actionable zombies (pages that *should* perform based on
topic relevance but are not — e.g., competitor comparisons, product
guides that got no traction)
---
## Step 4 — Write the report
---
### Content performance report — [date range]
**One-line summary:** [The single most important finding about how content
is (or is not) driving the business.]
---
#### Overall content health
| Metric | This period | Previous period | Change |
|--------|------------|-----------------|--------|
| Total content pages analysed | | | |
| Total sessions to content | | | |
| Organic sessions to content | | | |
| Paid sessions to content | | | |
| Organic % of total sessions | | | |
| Conversions (event name used) | | | |
| Organic conversion rate | | | |
| Zombie pages (< 50 sessions, 0 conv.) | | | |
---
#### Paid landing pages vs organic content (source split)
Before the category breakdown, report the overall traffic source mix:
| Source | Sessions | % of blog total | Conversions | Conv. rate |
|--------|----------|-----------------|-------------|------------|
| Organic Search | | | | |
| Paid (Cross-network + Paid Search) | | | | |
| Referral | | | | |
| Direct | | | | |
| Other | | | | |
If paid traffic represents more than 30% of blog sessions, add a callout:
> "⚠️ The blog depends on paid traffic for [X]% of sessions. Content
> performance metrics below are split by source to avoid conflating
> paid landing page results with organic content performance."
---
#### Organic stars — content that drives conversions from search
| Page | Organic sessions | Total sessions | Conversions | Conv. rate | Top query |
|------|-----------------|----------------|-------------|------------|-----------|
| (top 5 by conversions where organic > 50% of sessions) | | | | | |
If no pages qualify as organic stars (organic > 50% of sessions AND
conv. rate > 2%), state this explicitly — it is a critical finding that
means the blog has no organically-converting content.
**What they have in common:**
One paragraph identifying the pattern — topic type, content format,
funnel stage, CTA type, or search intent. This is the replication playbook.
If the only "stars" are paid-traffic landing pages, report them in a
separate mini-table and note: "These pages convert well but depend on
ad spend. They are campaign assets, not content assets."
---
#### Traffic without conversion — high-traffic pages not converting
| Page | Sessions | Conversions | Conv. rate | Intent diagnosis |
|------|----------|-------------|------------|-----------------|
| (top 5 by sessions with conv. rate below 1%) | | | | |
For each page, diagnose the intent:
- **Informational** — searcher wants to learn, not buy. The page is
doing its job. Consider a softer CTA (newsletter, resource download).
- **Misaligned audience** — traffic is coming from the wrong ICP.
Check the top queries driving traffic to this page.
- **CTA failure** — intent is right but the conversion mechanism is weak.
The page needs a better offer or placement.
---
#### Hidden gems — pages that convert but lack traffic
| Page | Sessions | Conversions | Conv. rate | Opportunity |
|------|----------|-------------|------------|-------------|
| (pages with conv. rate above 3% and sessions below 500) | | | | |
For each, recommend one specific action to drive more traffic:
- Internal linking from high-traffic pages on related topics
- Search Console position check — is it ranking page 2 for a good query?
- Promotion via email or LinkedIn
---
#### Zombie audit — content that is not working
First, report the zombie summary:
> **X of Y blog pages (Z%) are zombies** — fewer than 50 sessions and
> 0 conversions in 90 days. [One sentence on what this means for the blog.]
Then list the 5 most actionable zombies:
| Page | Sessions | Recommendation |
|------|----------|----------------|
| (5 zombies where the topic *should* work for the business) | | |
Recommendation options: update, consolidate with another post,
redirect to a better-performing page, or remove.
Give one specific recommendation per page, not a generic audit note.
Prioritise zombies that cover topics related to the product or ICP
(competitor comparisons, integration guides, use cases) over zombies
that were always off-topic (trending news, general tips).
---
#### What to create next
Based on the data, recommend one to two content pieces to produce
in the next sprint. For each:
- The topic and target query
- Why this gap exists (low competition, high intent, related to a star)
- The conversion mechanic to include (which CTA, which offer)
Do not recommend content just because a topic is trending.
Base it on what the data shows converts.
---
#### This period's insight
One paragraph. The single most actionable thing the content team
should change about their strategy based on this data.
Be specific. "Publish more conversion-focused content" is not an insight.
"Your top 3 converting posts are all comparison pages targeting
'[product] alternative' queries — you have no comparison content
for your two largest competitors" is an insight.
---
## Tone and output rules
- Conversion rate for blog content benchmarks: below 0.5% is low,
0.5%–2% is average, above 2% is strong for B2B SaaS.
- Never recommend publishing more content as the answer.
The answer is always publishing the right content.
- If GA4 conversion tracking is incomplete or missing, flag it
prominently — the entire analysis depends on it.
- Write in the same language the user is using.
- Keep recommendations specific enough that someone can act on them
tomorrow morning without asking a follow-up question.
- When the MCP saves results to a file (large datasets), process through
ds_utils — it handles both JSON and TSV formats automatically.
Never skip analysis because the file is too large.
- UTM stripping, URL aggregation, and organic/paid splitting are handled
by `process-ga4-pages` in ds_utils. Do not write inline scripts for this.
- A "star" that only converts paid traffic is an ad landing page, not
a content win. The `classify_content` function in ds_utils enforces
the >50% organic threshold for stars automatically.
---
## Related skills
- `ds-seo-weekly` — for query-level organic analysis
- `ds-channel-report` — for the full cross-channel picture
- `ds-churn-signals` — to check if low-quality content is attracting
users who are not a good fit for the product
Use when the task matches content performance and you can supply the relevant business, campaign, or performance context.
• A structured analysis flow
• Questions and checks to apply to supplied inputs
• A practical output format
Dataslayer MCP, accounts, scripts and agents are not bundled or authorized. Use supplied data unless the user explicitly authorizes an external action.
Use the skill below for [TASK]. First ask for the required context and data. Keep conclusions tied to supplied evidence. Do not connect accounts, run scripts, create agents, or take external actions unless the user explicitly requests and authorizes them.
Connecting Dataslayer, accessing accounts, running scripts, making changes, or treating missing data as verified evidence.
M11 added German-ready routing metadata, source attribution, integrity tracking and clear boundaries around external tools. The original MIT skill is retained unchanged. Dataslayer MCP connections, scripts, accounts, parallel agents and external actions are not bundled or authorized.
MIT License Copyright (c) 2026 Dataslayer S.L. Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
Copy the text below, then paste it into your chat.